Another child’s life has been lost in the corridors of a seminary —a place that should nurture, but instead became a site of unimaginable brutality. The tragic death of five-year-old in Gujrat district of Punjab, allegedly at the hands of his teacher and accomplices, is not an isolated case. Only months earlier, a similar incident…
Another child’s life has been lost in the corridors of a seminary —a place that should nurture, but instead became a site of unimaginable brutality. The tragic death of five-year-old in Gujrat district of Punjab, allegedly at the hands of his teacher and accomplices, is not an isolated case. Only months earlier, a similar incident in Swat valley of K-P saw a minor beaten to death by seminary staff. Both incidents triggered outrage, arrests and promises of accountability. But there is still no talk of the fact that religious seminaries, home to millions of poor children, remain an education system abandoned by meaningful oversight and reform.
For decades, madrassas have filled the gap left by the state’s failure to provide universal education. In rural areas and among impoverished families, they are often the only option. Parents send their children there not only to acquire religious learning but also because seminaries provide food and shelter. However, this dependence has allowed a parallel education system to grow unchecked, one in which vulnerable children are left at the mercy of unqualified teachers and almost non-existent regulatory mechanisms, in many cases. The government has made occasional attempts at reform, but these have largely remained cosmetic.
Moreover, these tragedies raise a moral question: why is violence so deeply entrenched in the pedagogy of many seminaries? Corporal punishment, despite being outlawed, continues with impunity. The absence of teacher training and accountability mechanisms allows abusive behaviour to persist. The state must enforce a no-tolerance policy towards such abuse. Strong deterrence measures —from strict monitoring to exemplary punishment for violators —are needed to signal that violence in the name of discipline will not be excused.
Reforming these institutions is not about undermining religious education, but about ensuring that children learn in safe environments. The country’s poorest children cannot be abandoned to an unsafe and unregulated system.
Islamabad – The Chairman of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), Hafiz ur Rehman, has appealed against a ruling by the Islamabad High Court (IHC) that ordered his removal from office. The appeal, filed under the 1972 Ordinance, challenges a judgment delivered by Justice Babar Sattar, who earlier issued a reserved verdict declaring Rehman’s appointment unlawful….
ISLAMABAD: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has once again raised the issue of imposing additional taxes on fertiliser and introducing an excise duty on the use of pesticides to partly offset a shortfall in the annual tax target, which the government has requested to defer until next year. The global lender has asked the government…
China’s former defence attache in South Asia Cheng Xizhong on Sunday spurned India’s much-delayed claim that it had shot down six Pakistani aircraft during the May conflict, terming it “self-amusement”.
Having faced international coverage of its own craft being downed by Pakistan and scathing criticism from the opposition, India’s Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh — three months after the conflict — claimed yesterday that his country had shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during those clashes.
While Pakistan had already denied that India downed any of its aircraft, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif swiftly rubbished Singh’s “belated assertions” yesterday.
Commenting on the matter today, Cheng said India’s allegations lacked strong evidence and have been “widely questioned by the international community, being considered groundless”, the Associated Press of Pakistanreported.
Singh’s remarks were “comical, implausible and unconvincing”. “We may call it self-amusement,” he said in a statement.
Pakistan said it downed six Indian planes during the conflict. India’s highest-ranking general has also acknowledged that its forces suffered losses in the air, but denied losing six aircraft.
“The Indian side has not presented any evidence, such as photos of the wreckage of the fighter jets, radar monitoring data, etc, while the Pakistani side had previously presented a large amount of relevant evidence of shooting down the Indian fighter jets,” Cheng noted.
The defence expert believed that everything should be based on sufficient evidence.
He highlighted that now, more than three months have passed since the India-Pakistan clash. New Delhi has never produced any evidence to prove that it had shot down Pakistani fighter jets, Cheng highlighted.
“In contrast, the Pakistan side immediately provided a detailed technical report to international media after the clash ended,” he added.
The Chinese expert also cited “confirmations from world leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence assessments that India suffered heavy losses of multiple aircraft”.
“It is thus evident that no Pakistani fighter jet was hit or destroyed by the Indian side. On the contrary, the Pakistani side shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed S-400 air defence positions, among other achievements, which is an indisputable fact,” he added.
Professor Cheng is currently a senior research fellow at the Chinese think tank Charhar Institute and has also served as a former United Nations senior military observer, according to CGTN.
In his claims yesterday, the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief did not mention the type of Pakistan’s fighter jets that he insisted were taken down.
Asif, responding to Singh, stated that “not a single Pakistani aircraft was hit or destroyed” by India. He declared that Pakistan took out six Indian jets, S-400 air defence batteries and unmanned aircraft of India while “swiftly putting several Indian airbases out of action”.
Former envoy to the United States Dr Maleeha Lodhi also termed Singh’s claim “laughable”, quipping that it took him “several months to count the planes to make this ridiculous assertion!”
Criticism also echoed from within India. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera cast his doubts, saying: “The question we have after today’s information … when we had such a strong army and we were advancing, then under whose pressure did you stop Operation Sindoor?”
New Delhi had previously claimed it had downed “a few planes”, refusing to go into the specifics of it. US President Donald Trump has echoed the figure of “five jets” shot down during the military confrontation, albeit without specifying which side’s craft he was referring to.
India’s loss of jets affirmed globally
France’s air chief, General Jerome Bellanger, has previously said that he has seen evidence of the loss of three Indian fighters, including a Rafale. The IAF has not commented on those claims.
Days after the air combat, The Washington Post, based on visual evidence analysed by experts, reported that at least two French-made Indian fighter aircraft were shot down by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF).
India’s defence attache to Indonesia, Indian Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, acknowledged in June that the PAF downed Indian fighters, according to The Wire.
India’s intelligence failure was central to the hour-long air battle with Pakistan, which led to the downing of Rafale aircraft by the PAF’s J-10 fighters using PL-15 missiles, according to a Reutersreport.
In a press briefing two days after the May 7 air combat, Air Vice Marshal (AVM) Aurangzeb Ahmed, the deputy chief of operations of Pakistan Air Force (PAF), shared the locations where five Indian jets were downed — four along the Line of Control and one near Bathinda in northwest India. He also disclosed that one of the Indian jets was downed by Pakistani air defence systems.
According to a Dawnreport, which cited PAF officials, India’s three Rafales, one Su-30MKI and one MiG-29 were downed within a 40-minute span. Not a single Pakistani jet crossed the border or engaged in close combat.
Describing the engagement as a textbook case of modern aerial warfare, AVM Aurangzeb had said Pakistan had tracked over 70 Indian aircraft — including 14 Rafales — using its Electromagnetic Operational Environment and responded with a concentrated and pre-planned defensive counter-air strategy.
“Our side deployed 42 high-tech aircraft,” the PAF officer said. He noted that while India remained on its side of the border and launched air-to-ground weapons, Pakistani defences detected and engaged the threats instantly.
Listentoarticle The escalating war between Israel and Iran is currently being led by two main developments that may eventually determine how this war might end. The first development is that President Trump has announced that he is giving Iran two weeks to reconsider its position before the US may take a final decision to enter…
World Bank Group President Ajay Banga met Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in New York, where the premier hailed the Bank’s long-standing support to Pakistan, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic and the devastating 2022 floods. PM Shehbaz briefed Banga on the government’s comprehensive reform agenda covering resource mobilisation, energy-sector reforms, privatisation and measures to build resilience…
Peshawar – The Workers Welfare Board Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has suspended the principals of 15 schools after students from these institutions showed poor performance in matriculation examinations. According to the official notification, the suspended principals include those from: Working Folks Grammar School Haripur (Hattar) Karak Kohat-I and Kohat-II Working Folks Grammar School Peshawar-II Mardan Shehbaz Azmat…
