Kurdish autonomy falls, redrawing Syrias geopolitical map

The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a US-backed umbrella group dominated by armed Syrian Kurds from the YPG and linked to the PKK which Turkey designates a terrorist organization, rapidly collapsed over the weekend due to thecoordinated defectionof their Arab tribal junior partners.

Their geopolitical project of building an autonomous region organized according to PKK founder Abdullah Ocalan’s socialist-liberal “democratic confederalist” ideology, which the United States had exploited as a regional wedge, is now over.

The SDF’s dramatic reversal of fortune, from controlling Syria’s agricultural, energy and water resources for years to being forced by fast-moving events into alopsided ceasefirethat restores the central state’s authority over these assets and territory is largely attributable to three reasons.

The first is that this control was always fragile given tensions caused by the imposition of the group’s socialist-liberal “democratic confederalist” model on the authoritarian-Islamist tribal society of local Arab communities.

The second factor explains why mass defections had not occurred earlier: US military patronage of the SDF, which ended only under Trump 2.0. His newNational Security Strategydeprioritizes West Asia and seeks broadly to avoid foreign entanglements.

As a result, the SDF’s role as a regional wedge against Iran’s local allies, Syria and Turkey became outdated. This helps to explain why the US did not block the dismantling of the group’s geopolitical project and instead stepped aside.

The final factor was a miscalculation by the SDF’s armed Syrian Kurdish core, which believed the US was a more reliable ally than ex-President BasharAssad. Had they broken with the US before it abandoned them, they might have secured a deal for preserving part of their autonomous region.

New Syrian President Ahmed Sharaadecreedlanguage rights and citizenship for Kurds shortly before this weekend’s events, but those measures fall short of the political and territorial autonomy for which many fought and died.

With the causes of Syria’s rapid dismantling of Kurdish autonomy established, attention now turns to the consequences. Chief among them is a major geostrategic victory for Turkey, which has eliminated the military and territorial threat posed by PKK-allied andIsraeli-alignedarmed Syrian Kurds, advanced its goal of subordinating Syria and can now focus more fully onexpanding its influence eastwardinto Central Asia.

The first two outcomes challenge Israeli interests, while the third challenges Russia’s.

An intensification ofIsraeli-Turkish rivalry in Syriais already a concern for Israel, especially if Turkey leverages potential membershipin aPakistani-Saudi allianceto encourage those states, and possiblyprospective member Egypt, to increase pressure on it.

This emerging “Islamic NATO”, emboldened by victories inSouth Yemenand Syria, could expand military cooperation in the Levant, including Syria and perhaps Jordan, and eventually into Central Asia, including Kazakhstan, in ways that threaten both Israel and Russia.

The consolidation of Turkish influence over Syria strengthens a nascent military bloc within the Ummah and supports the emergence of a new pole at the crossroads of Afro-Eurasia if its prospective members formalize their ties.

The US appears to tacitly approve of this, likely viewing an “Islamic NATO” of Arab, Pakistani and Turkic states as the ultimate wedge to keep the Eastern Hemisphere divided, given its geostrategic location and inherent frictions withRussia,India,Israel, theEU andSub–SaharanAfrica.

A version of thisarticlewas first published on Andrew Korybko’s Substack and is republished here with editing for clarity and fluency. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriberhere.